| We are pleased to publish our eighth
annual table of the UK Top 50 IT training providers.
How we compile this listing
As we have done in previous years, we gathered the revenues of
companies with IT training businesses and excluded sales of training
delivered outside the UK and non-IT related business from those
companies that offer both types. We also exclude organisations whose
revenue is derived principally from publicly funded training or
from military/defence-specific IT training, training franchises
whose revenues consist only of royalties and training brokers/portals.
Financial results for some of these organisations are on public
record. In those cases, we have used the actual turnover figure
for their most recently reported financial year. For organisations
whose turnover is not published, we have made our best estimate
based on the information available to us. For every company, we
have indicated clearly whether the figure shown is an actual or
an estimate. Actual (published) revenues are indicated as "A"
- all estimates are marked as "E" in
the Act/Est column.
Figures are UK revenues only, are rounded
to the nearest £100,000 and relate to fiscal years ending
in 2005 (i.e. accounts for the year ending sometime between 1 January
2005 and 31 December 2005) or cover the 2005 calendar year.
N.B. The 2004 revenues (used for last year's Top
50) of a few companies are now known to have been incorrect. We
have not, however, altered those companies' 2005 rankings but the
percentage change in revenue has been calculated on what we now
believe last year's revenues to have been.
| TOP
50 UK IT TRAINING PROVIDERS - 2006 |
|
Rank
2006 |
|
Company |
FY2005
Revenue
£m |
Act / Est |
Revenue
change |
Rank
2005 |
| 1 |
 |
QA |
27.1 |
A |
3% |
1 |
| 2 |
 |
InterQuad Learning |
26.6 |
E |
30% |
5 |
| 3 |
 |
Learning Tree International |
23.6 |
E |
0% |
4 |
| 4 |
 |
Parity Training |
22.5 |
E |
-5% |
3 |
| 5 |
 |
IBM Education Services |
19.0 |
E |
-22% |
2 |
| 6 |
 |
SAP |
18.1 |
A |
9% |
7 |
| 7 |
 |
Oracle University |
17.7 |
E |
13.3% |
9 |
| 8 |
 |
Thomson NETg |
16.2 |
E |
0% |
8 |
| 9 |
 |
Computeach International |
16.0 |
E |
10% |
- |
| 10 |
 |
Xpertise Training |
15.3 |
A |
16% |
12 |
| 11 |
 |
Azlan |
15.0 |
E |
2% |
11 |
| 12 |
 |
LogicaCMG |
14.9 |
E |
20% |
13 |
| 13 |
 |
PPI Learning |
14.0 |
E |
-1% |
10 |
| 14 |
 |
SkillSoft |
12.8 |
E |
16% |
6 |
| 15 |
 |
Training Synergy |
10.3 |
A |
140% |
- |
| 16 |
 |
Sun Microsystems |
10.0 |
E |
-8% |
14 |
| 17 |
 |
Assima Group |
10.0 |
E |
59% |
- |
| 18 |
 |
HP Education |
9.0 |
E |
10% |
16 |
| 19 |
 |
Global Knowledge |
8.3 |
E |
2% |
15 |
| 20 |
 |
Remarc Group |
8.3 |
E |
17% |
18 |
| 21 |
 |
New Horizons |
8.0 |
E |
11% |
17 |
| 22 |
 |
KnowledgePool |
7.2 |
A |
7% |
19 |
| 23 |
 |
The Matchett Group |
7.1 |
A |
18% |
21 |
| 24 |
 |
Third Force/Electric Paper |
6.3 |
E |
9% |
22 |
| 25 |
 |
The Training Camp |
4.3 |
A |
10% |
24 |
| 26 |
 |
Red Tray |
3.7 |
A |
810% |
- |
| 27 |
 |
WDR |
3.6 |
E |
3% |
27 |
| 28 |
 |
Sage |
3.6 |
E |
0% |
25 |
| 29 |
 |
Key Training Solutions |
3.5 |
E |
0% |
26 |
| 30 |
 |
Red Hat |
3.4 |
A |
14% |
29 |
| 31 |
 |
Learn IT |
3.2 |
E |
23% |
33 |
| 32 |
 |
BT Training Solutions (NI) |
3.2 |
A |
4% |
28 |
| 33 |
 |
Computer Associates |
3.0 |
E |
7% |
31 |
| 34 |
 |
BroadSkill |
2.9 |
A |
29% |
42 |
| 35 |
 |
iTrain |
2.9 |
A |
11% |
35 |
| 36 |
 |
Steria Training Services |
2.9 |
E |
0% |
30 |
| 37 |
 |
Learning IT |
2.8 |
A |
17% |
32 |
| 38 |
 |
Fuel |
2.8 |
A |
73% |
36 |
| 39 |
 |
InTechnology |
2.6 |
E |
3% |
37 |
| 40 |
 |
WWP Training |
2.5 |
A |
8% |
43 |
| 41 |
 |
ILX Group |
2.5 |
A |
144% |
- |
| 42 |
 |
Bytes Technology Group |
2.5 |
A |
24% |
- |
| 43 |
 |
Host Computers |
2.4 |
A |
-1% |
41 |
| 44 |
 |
Kaleidoscope Training |
2.4 |
A |
32% |
- |
| 45 |
 |
Deverill |
2.3 |
A |
92% |
- |
| 46 |
 |
Happy Computers |
2.3 |
A |
28% |
50 |
| 47 |
 |
StayAhead Training |
2.3 |
A |
5% |
44 |
| 48 |
 |
Xansa |
2.3 |
E |
-10% |
39 |
| 49 |
 |
Ajilon Learning |
2.1 |
A |
6% |
49 |
| 50 |
 |
PremierIT |
2.0 |
A |
24% |
34 |
Last year's Top 50 can be found here
Links to each of these companies' websites can be found on the
Who's Who page.
Thank you
We would like to thank everybody - training providers and others
- who has contributed to this project.
If you have any comments or if you believe any aspect of our information
is inaccurate or incomplete please let us know by email or by calling
IT Skills Research/Pardo Fox Ltd on 01483 454 363
IMPORTANT: This information has been carefully
researched. However, we can not guarantee its accuracy or completeness,
and we will not accept liability for any direct, indirect or consequential
loss arising from its use.
Barrie Charles's commentary from
the Top 50 article in IT Training July 2006
A year of change
It's been another year of growth, but not as we know it. The nature
of who is being trained in what - and how - is changing, and suppliers
who adapt to this shift are thriving.
Barrie
Charles reports
The UK IT training market continued to recover in 2005, posting
a healthy growth of 9% over 2004, according to data from IT Skills
Research. But behind this figure lies a fundamental shift in what
customers want and expect from their suppliers. Five years ago,
the major requirement was for technical training aimed at IT professionals,
which made up perhaps as much as 80% of the market. Now IT user
training takes a much bigger slice, and the main growth area for
IT staff has been in professional and soft skills. So what’s
behind these changes in demand? As IT becomes more fundamental to
business and systems grow in sophistication, UK organisations are
beginning to recognise that it pays to invest in user skills. At
the same time, the amount of ‘must-have’ base technology
has declined. Although Microsoft has brought out new software releases
over the past year with SQL Server and Visual Studio 2005, the change
from previous versions is not as great as it once was, and companies
have become much more cautious about upgrading their systems.
Limited opportunities
Of course there are exceptions, and in the Cisco world there has
been a big growth in the need for security and voice over IP skills.
Changes to certification schemes have also helped fuel demand. In
addition,Microsoft hopes that the next versions of Windows and Office,
due out towards the end of the year or early in 2007,will provide
a lift.
But another factor is militating against significant growth in technical
training: the outsourcing of IT provision by organisations has reduced
their need for technical staff. IT suppliers have economies of scale
and therefore require fewer resources to provide the same service,
especially as many of them are offshoring some activities to India
and other countries.
On the other hand,there is a recognition that the IT function must
manage projects better and needs to integrate more closely with
the business. Hence the huge growth in courses covering areas such
as project management, business analysis, systems design and interpersonal
skills. Several of the top IT training suppliers that used to do
only technical training now derive around a third of their revenues
from such professional skills development.
As well as changes in who is trained and in what, fundamental shifts
are also occurring in how the training is done. Blended learning
continues to grow, with 57% of organisations now claiming to use
the approach in at least some of their training, according to IT
Skills Research’s survey of buyers completed in September
of last year. This trend is echoed by the findings of the 2006 Chartered
Institute for Professional Development survey which reported that
79% of respondents thought that learning and training now incorporated
a much wider variety of activities.
Rising expectations
This is perhaps most evident in user training, where day-long, ‘sheep-dip’
training is a thing of the past and online elements, floor walking
and short face-to-face sessions are on the rise. Increasingly training
is customised, both at the organisational and the individual level.
One-on-one training, whether at the desk, in clinics or over the
net, is growing in importance.
In the e-learning arena, long standard courses are no longer seen
as the answer, with short on-demand modules becoming the order of
the day. What some commentators are calling the ‘Google effect’
means that users want quick answers to their difficulties as and
when they encounter them.
Virtual classrooms are also slowly gaining acceptance, especially
in technical training. Global Knowledge now uses the approach routinely
in single company programmes, while Thomson NETg offers a public
schedule of courses and IBM is piloting a similar product. According
to IT Skills Research, 27% of organisations now use virtual classroom
techniques.
The other change in how training is done is that more and more organisations
are outsourcing responsibility. According to the same survey, 7%
of businesses have now outsourced all of their training to a single
provider,with 29% using the approach for a part of their needs.
A further 21% are considering the use of managed training services
(MTS) in the future.
The effect on suppliers
Of course these trends have had a profound effect on training suppliers.
In addition, the commoditisation of the market has continued, particularly
with vendor technical training.The result is that several of the
major providers that made their name in the space have faced serious
profitability problems. Indeed, there are some signs that a major
shakeout has begun.
So far in 2006, InterQuad has bid for QA, while Azlan Training was
acquired by Global Knowledge to create Europe’s largest technical
training company. Oracle’s purchase of Siebel was also completed
earlier this year.
But, despite other consolidations over the past five years, the
share of the market occupied by the top 10 suppliers has been in
long-term decline, down from 57% in 2001 to 45% in 2005. This reflects
the shift to user and professional skills training, which so far
has tended to be provided by a large number of smaller suppliers.
As vendor course prices have fallen, ensuring tight cost control
and a high utilisation of classroom and trainer resources have become
vital. As a result, less popular courses have been dropped and sales
effort and pricing deals focus on filling classes.
New business models have also emerged. Companies such as Training
Synergy and BroadSkill,which operate large freelance trainer networks,
are increasingly winning user training projects on the basis of
their highly flexible resourcing capability and lower overheads.
Similarly, ‘resource light’ providers including Redtray
and Bytes Technology Group are gaining share in the MTS market thanks
to the discounts they offer and the services they provide over and
above those offered by mere ‘training brokers’.
The Top 50
So what effect has all this had on our Top 50 table? Well, in fact,
the top 5 are exactly the same as last year, if in a different order.However,with
the exception of InterQuad,which continues to grow at an amazing
pace, the average revenue growth of the other four is 6%.
Taking a wider look, the overall picture is of just a few players
moving steadily up the table,while the remainder shuffle downwards
or are in more serious decline. Only 10 providers have risen, but
26 have fallen.
This is partly due to the effect of new entrants jumping in quite
high up the table: Training Synergy at number 15 and Redtray at
26. In addition, Computeach, a major training supplier to individual
buyers, appears in our table at number 9 this year, thanks to its
increasing focus on the corporate market. The other new entrants
are ILX Group, Bytes Technology Group, Kaleidoscope Training and
Deverill.
The fastest percentage growth in revenues was shown by Redtray,
ILX Group,Training Synergy, Deverill, Fuel and Assima Group –
all more than 50%. In terms of absolute revenues, InterQuad Learning,
Training Synergy, Assima Group and Redtray went up the most. The
largest fall in both percentage and absolute revenue terms was IBM,
probably due to a single large project which moved off the books.
As far as places go, BroadSkill rose the most, while the largest
fallers were PremierIT, Xansa and SkillSoft.
Gone from our table are Tata Interactive Systems, Getronics, Epic,
AdVal, Eclectic Group and SAS Software. Also, DACG is now part of
Assima Group, while PeopleSoft merged with Oracle. Please note as
well that Spring IT Training is now known as PPI Learning.
Looking ahead
But enough of the past,what about the future? Most of the trends
outlined above are likely to continue for many years, while the
market looks set to show modest growth again. In a comprehensive
survey of 1,000 organisations conducted by e-Skills UK, 19% of respondents
expected to increase IT training spend in 2006, with only 3% foreseeing
a decrease. Again, user training is expected to take a larger share,
with 14% seeing growth in this area, compared to 9% planning more
technical training.
IT Skills Research’s measure of confidence among training
suppliers also reports growing revenues and profits for the first
quarter of 2006.But, of course, some will fare much better than
others.
How are your favourite suppliers managing and how do they stack
up against the competition? Read on and find out.
© Haymarket Management Publications / IT Skills Research
/ Pardo Fox Ltd 2006
|